[DUG-TO] Drupalcamp 2009 -- possible summer dates

James Walker walkah at walkah.net
Tue May 19 18:05:04 EDT 2009


My vote continues to be with the August date - it give better lead  
time for sponsors - particularly over the slow moving / hard to get  
ahold of anyone summer months.

But, I agree: we need to just call it and get the other pieces moving.

We can do one last push / call to action for votes if we want. Close  
the poll end of tomorrow if need be, but let's not let it drag on any  
longer.


On 19-May-09, at 5:43 PM, Andre Molnar wrote:

> I'm going to say that Julian or Sacha make the executive decision on  
> the
> date.  Early July as out - Late July is popular, but August is NOT
> unpopular: SO if the time is needed I think we're justified in picking
> the later date - else we go with the majority of responses we've  
> gotten.
>
> Worst case, flip a coin, give MaRS a call and for better or worse we
> have a date, a deadline and something to work towards.
>
> andre
>
> Chris Luckhardt wrote:
>> This point is admittedly a groaner, but semantically speaking you
>> could say the poll results are 50/50 - 50% for the 25th/26th and 50%
>> against that weekend.  Such is the nature of polls.
>>
>> IMO, with 3 dates available to us, the next most important thing is
>> firming up sponsors and having the time to do so.  So is 3 months
>> necessary or is 2 months enough time to get that aspect of the event
>> organized?  Beyond Sasha's sponsorship letter, what else has been
>> accomplished regarding sponsors?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>>
>> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Julian Egelstaff
>> <julian.egelstaff-lists at freeformsolutions.ca> wrote:
>>> So it's been all quiet here today....the poll says July 25/26 is  
>>> still out
>>> in front.  But the sample is small and the margin is not huge.  If  
>>> those who
>>> have more experience in the matter feel the extra time is crucial  
>>> for
>>> shoring up sponsors, maybe we go for the August weekend?  Or does  
>>> majority
>>> rule?  I need to tell MaRS something.
>>>
>>> --Julian
>>>
>>> Julian Egelstaff wrote:
>>>> Andre Molnar wrote:
>>>>> Julian, see if your contact will give us two days to decide  
>>>>> (i.e. can
>>>>> the dates be held for 2 days).  If so lets give it another 48  
>>>>> hours.
>>>> They will hold those dates for us until Tuesday at noon.
>>>>
>>>> --Julian
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> DUG-TO mailing list
>>>> DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
>>>> http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DUG-TO mailing list
>>> DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
>>> http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DUG-TO mailing list
>> DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
>> http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
>
> _______________________________________________
> DUG-TO mailing list
> DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
> http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to

--
James Walker :: http://walkah.net/ :: xmpp:walkah at walkah.net




More information about the DUG-TO mailing list