[DUG-TO] If I could vote again...
Eduardo Dutra
eduardo.m.dutra at gmail.com
Tue May 19 18:23:49 EDT 2009
...I'd vote again for the August dates to ensure adequate time to gather not
only sponsors but ourselves in terms of the other planning etc. In any case,
the poll is such a small sample so I support an executive decision.
Cheers, Eduardo
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:12 PM, <dug-to-request at lists.openject.com> wrote:
> Send DUG-TO mailing list submissions to
> dug-to at lists.openject.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> dug-to-request at lists.openject.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> dug-to-owner at lists.openject.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of DUG-TO digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Help finding lost page after error: field 'body' doesn't have
> a default value (Philip Kiff)
> 2. Re: Drupalcamp 2009 -- possible summer dates (Julian Egelstaff)
> 3. Re: Drupalcamp 2009 -- possible summer dates (Chris Luckhardt)
> 4. Re: Drupalcamp 2009 -- possible summer dates (Andre Molnar)
> 5. Re: Drupalcamp 2009 -- possible summer dates (Jane Zhang)
> 6. Re: Drupalcamp 2009 -- possible summer dates (James Walker)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:19:40 -0400
> From: Philip Kiff <pkiff at iwh.on.ca>
> Subject: [DUG-TO] Help finding lost page after error: field 'body'
> doesn't have a default value
> To: Drupal Users Group Toronto <dug-to at lists.openject.com>
> Message-ID: <C638626C.7721%pkiff at iwh.on.ca<C638626C.7721%25pkiff at iwh.on.ca>
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Toronto Drupal folks,
>
> Wondering if anyone might be able to help me with this.
>
> Running Drupal 6.10 on IIS 7. During a standard page edit, I received the
> following PHP error (replaced elements indicated by [--]):
>
> Field 'body'; doesn't have a default value query: INSERT INTO
> node_revisions
> (nid, uid, title, teaser, log, timestamp, format) VALUES (644, 4,
> '[--correct title of page appears here--]';, '', 'Added PDF of full
> paper.',
> 1242321716, 0) in [--correct path to includes appears here--]\common.inc on
> line 3422.
>
> And now the page does not show up in Drupal at all: the path alias returns
> a
> page-not-found and so does the actual node where that the page originates
> from.
>
> In the MySQL db, I can find the node in the "node" table, and under nid it
> shows 644 (the correct node) but under vid it shows 0 instead of a number,
> whereas all the others I see have a number showing for vid. I've no idea
> what that means or whether there is a way for me to fiddle with this or any
> other table directly to bring the page back again.
>
> Can I recover the lost page somehow and make it show up again via the
> regular Drupal editing interface (published or not)?
>
> I'm using the diff module, and I thought perhaps I could pull data out of
> that somehow if necessary, but I wouldn't know where to go to find a copy
> of
> the previous body text. And the specific edit that resulted in the error
> does not show up in the "node_revisions" table. Currently when I try to
> pull
> up the node or page alias all I get is a page not found so I can't revert
> whatever changes were made. Not all my modules are up-to-date, but the diff
> module is at 6.x-2.0.
>
> I posted this question over on the Drupal.org forums, but got no reply:
> error on edit - field body doesn't have a default value - find lost page
> again?
> http://drupal.org/node/462804
>
> I am a little bit concerned that maybe the error is a sign of some
> incompatibility or database corruption that I am otherwise unaware of. I'm
> planning on upgrading up to 6.12 later today or tomorrow.
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
>
> This e-mail may contain confidential information for the sole use of the
> intended recipient.
> Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was
> originally intended is prohibited.
> If you have received this e-mail in error please delete all copies.
> Opinions conclusions or other information contained in this e-mail may not
> be that of the organization.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:03:50 -0400
> From: Julian Egelstaff <julian.egelstaff-lists at freeformsolutions.ca>
> Subject: Re: [DUG-TO] Drupalcamp 2009 -- possible summer dates
> To: Drupal Users Group Toronto <dug-to at lists.openject.com>
> Message-ID: <4A131EB6.3090206 at freeformsolutions.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> So it's been all quiet here today....the poll says July 25/26 is still
> out in front. But the sample is small and the margin is not huge. If
> those who have more experience in the matter feel the extra time is
> crucial for shoring up sponsors, maybe we go for the August weekend? Or
> does majority rule? I need to tell MaRS something.
>
> --Julian
>
> Julian Egelstaff wrote:
> > Andre Molnar wrote:
> >> Julian, see if your contact will give us two days to decide (i.e. can
> >> the dates be held for 2 days). If so lets give it another 48 hours.
> > They will hold those dates for us until Tuesday at noon.
> >
> > --Julian
> > _______________________________________________
> > DUG-TO mailing list
> > DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
> > http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:36:19 -0400
> From: Chris Luckhardt <chrisluckhardt at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [DUG-TO] Drupalcamp 2009 -- possible summer dates
> To: Drupal Users Group Toronto <dug-to at lists.openject.com>
> Message-ID:
> <4bb583d20905191436u6ecdeb0dof7f38162062c98d at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> This point is admittedly a groaner, but semantically speaking you
> could say the poll results are 50/50 - 50% for the 25th/26th and 50%
> against that weekend. Such is the nature of polls.
>
> IMO, with 3 dates available to us, the next most important thing is
> firming up sponsors and having the time to do so. So is 3 months
> necessary or is 2 months enough time to get that aspect of the event
> organized? Beyond Sasha's sponsorship letter, what else has been
> accomplished regarding sponsors?
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Julian Egelstaff
> <julian.egelstaff-lists at freeformsolutions.ca> wrote:
> > So it's been all quiet here today....the poll says July 25/26 is still
> out
> > in front. ?But the sample is small and the margin is not huge. ?If those
> who
> > have more experience in the matter feel the extra time is crucial for
> > shoring up sponsors, maybe we go for the August weekend? ?Or does
> majority
> > rule? ?I need to tell MaRS something.
> >
> > --Julian
> >
> > Julian Egelstaff wrote:
> >>
> >> Andre Molnar wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Julian, see if your contact will give us two days to decide (i.e. can
> >>> the dates be held for 2 days). ?If so lets give it another 48 hours.
> >>
> >> They will hold those dates for us until Tuesday at noon.
> >>
> >> --Julian
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> DUG-TO mailing list
> >> DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
> >> http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DUG-TO mailing list
> > DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
> > http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:43:12 -0400
> From: Andre Molnar <andre at becircle.com>
> Subject: Re: [DUG-TO] Drupalcamp 2009 -- possible summer dates
> To: Drupal Users Group Toronto <dug-to at lists.openject.com>,
> "sacha at sachachua.com" <sacha at sachachua.com>
> Message-ID: <4A1327F0.90509 at becircle.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> I'm going to say that Julian or Sacha make the executive decision on the
> date. Early July as out - Late July is popular, but August is NOT
> unpopular: SO if the time is needed I think we're justified in picking
> the later date - else we go with the majority of responses we've gotten.
>
> Worst case, flip a coin, give MaRS a call and for better or worse we
> have a date, a deadline and something to work towards.
>
> andre
>
> Chris Luckhardt wrote:
> > This point is admittedly a groaner, but semantically speaking you
> > could say the poll results are 50/50 - 50% for the 25th/26th and 50%
> > against that weekend. Such is the nature of polls.
> >
> > IMO, with 3 dates available to us, the next most important thing is
> > firming up sponsors and having the time to do so. So is 3 months
> > necessary or is 2 months enough time to get that aspect of the event
> > organized? Beyond Sasha's sponsorship letter, what else has been
> > accomplished regarding sponsors?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Julian Egelstaff
> > <julian.egelstaff-lists at freeformsolutions.ca> wrote:
> >> So it's been all quiet here today....the poll says July 25/26 is still
> out
> >> in front. But the sample is small and the margin is not huge. If those
> who
> >> have more experience in the matter feel the extra time is crucial for
> >> shoring up sponsors, maybe we go for the August weekend? Or does
> majority
> >> rule? I need to tell MaRS something.
> >>
> >> --Julian
> >>
> >> Julian Egelstaff wrote:
> >>> Andre Molnar wrote:
> >>>> Julian, see if your contact will give us two days to decide (i.e. can
> >>>> the dates be held for 2 days). If so lets give it another 48 hours.
> >>> They will hold those dates for us until Tuesday at noon.
> >>>
> >>> --Julian
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> DUG-TO mailing list
> >>> DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
> >>> http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> DUG-TO mailing list
> >> DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
> >> http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > DUG-TO mailing list
> > DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
> > http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:40:56 -0400
> From: Jane Zhang <jane at bitfog.net>
> Subject: Re: [DUG-TO] Drupalcamp 2009 -- possible summer dates
> To: Drupal Users Group Toronto <dug-to at lists.openject.com>
> Message-ID:
> <3037a13f0905191440t4011aa20ma07c279537b2f55e at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi all,
>
> If the sample is small and the margin is not huge, I would say look at if
> any of the must have speakers are going to be around for both weekends. I
> personally think the more time we have to work on sponsorships, the better
> it's going to be.
>
> Jane
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Julian Egelstaff <
> julian.egelstaff-lists at freeformsolutions.ca> wrote:
>
> > So it's been all quiet here today....the poll says July 25/26 is still
> out
> > in front. But the sample is small and the margin is not huge. If those
> who
> > have more experience in the matter feel the extra time is crucial for
> > shoring up sponsors, maybe we go for the August weekend? Or does
> majority
> > rule? I need to tell MaRS something.
> >
> > --Julian
> >
> >
> > Julian Egelstaff wrote:
> >
> >> Andre Molnar wrote:
> >>
> >>> Julian, see if your contact will give us two days to decide (i.e. can
> >>> the dates be held for 2 days). If so lets give it another 48 hours.
> >>>
> >> They will hold those dates for us until Tuesday at noon.
> >>
> >> --Julian
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> DUG-TO mailing list
> >> DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
> >> http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DUG-TO mailing list
> > DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
> > http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openject.com/pipermail/dug-to/attachments/20090519/e91f657d/attachment-0001.htm
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 18:05:04 -0400
> From: James Walker <walkah at walkah.net>
> Subject: Re: [DUG-TO] Drupalcamp 2009 -- possible summer dates
> To: Drupal Users Group Toronto <dug-to at lists.openject.com>
> Cc: "sacha at sachachua.com" <sacha at sachachua.com>
> Message-ID: <B34E4A6A-46DF-4CC5-BAA9-FFA5804A5E42 at walkah.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> My vote continues to be with the August date - it give better lead
> time for sponsors - particularly over the slow moving / hard to get
> ahold of anyone summer months.
>
> But, I agree: we need to just call it and get the other pieces moving.
>
> We can do one last push / call to action for votes if we want. Close
> the poll end of tomorrow if need be, but let's not let it drag on any
> longer.
>
>
> On 19-May-09, at 5:43 PM, Andre Molnar wrote:
>
> > I'm going to say that Julian or Sacha make the executive decision on
> > the
> > date. Early July as out - Late July is popular, but August is NOT
> > unpopular: SO if the time is needed I think we're justified in picking
> > the later date - else we go with the majority of responses we've
> > gotten.
> >
> > Worst case, flip a coin, give MaRS a call and for better or worse we
> > have a date, a deadline and something to work towards.
> >
> > andre
> >
> > Chris Luckhardt wrote:
> >> This point is admittedly a groaner, but semantically speaking you
> >> could say the poll results are 50/50 - 50% for the 25th/26th and 50%
> >> against that weekend. Such is the nature of polls.
> >>
> >> IMO, with 3 dates available to us, the next most important thing is
> >> firming up sponsors and having the time to do so. So is 3 months
> >> necessary or is 2 months enough time to get that aspect of the event
> >> organized? Beyond Sasha's sponsorship letter, what else has been
> >> accomplished regarding sponsors?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Chris
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Julian Egelstaff
> >> <julian.egelstaff-lists at freeformsolutions.ca> wrote:
> >>> So it's been all quiet here today....the poll says July 25/26 is
> >>> still out
> >>> in front. But the sample is small and the margin is not huge. If
> >>> those who
> >>> have more experience in the matter feel the extra time is crucial
> >>> for
> >>> shoring up sponsors, maybe we go for the August weekend? Or does
> >>> majority
> >>> rule? I need to tell MaRS something.
> >>>
> >>> --Julian
> >>>
> >>> Julian Egelstaff wrote:
> >>>> Andre Molnar wrote:
> >>>>> Julian, see if your contact will give us two days to decide
> >>>>> (i.e. can
> >>>>> the dates be held for 2 days). If so lets give it another 48
> >>>>> hours.
> >>>> They will hold those dates for us until Tuesday at noon.
> >>>>
> >>>> --Julian
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> DUG-TO mailing list
> >>>> DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
> >>>> http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> DUG-TO mailing list
> >>> DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
> >>> http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> DUG-TO mailing list
> >> DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
> >> http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DUG-TO mailing list
> > DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
> > http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
>
> --
> James Walker :: http://walkah.net/ :: xmpp:walkah at walkah.net<xmpp%3Awalkah at walkah.net>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> DUG-TO mailing list
> DUG-TO at lists.openject.com
> http://lists.openject.com/listinfo/dug-to
>
>
> End of DUG-TO Digest, Vol 44, Issue 14
> **************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openject.com/pipermail/dug-to/attachments/20090519/ead8a871/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the DUG-TO
mailing list